Daily Archive for October 6th, 2008

A Lambic Side-by-Side Experiment

Mike at Nikki’s Liquors gave me a great idea… buy two lambics and do a side-by-side comparison.  The reason for doing this is simple, they’re the same beer, one is just aged longer.  The beers are Kriek (cherry) lambics from Oud Beersel.  We started off with the Kriek, just a standard cherry lambic.  This one was very sweet, almost juice-like.  It was thicker and more syrupy.  There was no detectable tartness or sourness to this one.  In fact, I just plain didn’t care for it.

The older brother, however, the Oude Kriek Vieille, was quite different.  This beer actually tasted like a lambic.  It poured a nice cloudy deep red with a small pink head.  It smelled nice and funky and musty (this is a good thing).  The flavor was tart and sour cherries, some must and mildew (again, this is a good thing).  This is what a lambic is supposed to be.

I can’t understand why this brewery, which can clearly make a great lambic, would make the regular Kriek like that.  The Oude Kriek Vieille wins this one by a landslide.  Susan liked them both – the first because it was a sweet dessert beer and the second because it was sour “like a true lambic”.  I’ve heard rumors that one of these beers (the good one) might be featured at an upcoming beer dinner.  I’ve also heard some rumors about the possibility of a sour beer dinner (that’d be one kick ass palate killer).  I’m not just a hophead, I’m also a sour/funkhead.

Phish for Non-Phans

Expect a lot more posts about Phish in the next few years (or until they decide to “break up” again).  Anyway, I saw a great article from a Paste Magazine blog about Phish.  It’s basically a guide to Phish for non-phans.  The article takes people through their studio albums and picks out the songs for the Phishheads and the songs for the Phish newbies.

The article has some nice streams of some of the picks.  And, even though they got some information wrong, I have to agree with the majority of their picks.  Here’s what their Newbie Mix looks like:

1. Dirt
2. Farmhouse
3. Sleep
4. Birds of a Feather
5. Wading in the Velvet Sea
6. Roggae
7. Brian and Robert
8. Free
9. Waste
10. Character Zero
11. Lifeboy
12. Julius
13. If I Could
14. Sample in a Jar
15. Fast enough For You
16. My Friend, My Friend
17. Silent in the Morning
18. Run Like an Antelope
19. Lawn Boy
20. Chalkdust Torture
21. Poor Heart
22. Contact
23. Golgi Apparatus

The only song on there I would disagree with is “Run Like an Antelope”, a mostly instrumental song.  I would replace it with “Bouncing Around the Room”, though I’d replace it with the live version from A Live One rather than use the awful Lawn Boy version.  I would also consider adding “Fluffhead” from Junta, but not “Fluff’s Travels”.

Anyway, I know I have a lot of non-phans who read my blog (assuming those people still read it… Ryan, I’m looking at you).  Knowing that Phish is the greatest band to ever step foot on this planet, I am on a never ending quest to prove to everyone that there’s at least something about Phish you’ll like.  Since I know a lot of people who could really care less about Phish, take a listen to some of the songs.  If you know me and really want a more custom playlist, let me know and I’ll tell you which songs to check out.  Keep in mind that this guide is only going through the studio stuff.  Their live stuff is a completely different ballgame and does take some getting used to (unless you’re like me and know how great they are).  Many of these songs sound completely different live, though some of them aren’t too far off their studio sound.  Phish is a jamband, they improvise, they jam, they make shit up on stage.  No two shows are ever the same.  Many of these songs are just leaping points for their jams.

Now onto my issues with this article… The article completely rules out their final two albums, Round Room and Undermind.  While I do understand why, to a degree, I think they do a grave disservice to the Phish newbies and non-phans they’re trying to help with this article.  I’ll take it where the article leaves off and give a newbie and a “head” guide to these albums.  I’ll start with Undermind, it’s the easiest.

The songs on Undermind lack much of the great song structure that the songs from their previous albums contained.  Most of Undermind is very weak.  Some of it is just downright crappy pop (as catchy as it may be).  If you’re a newbie/non-head, check out “Scents and Subtle Sounds” (both the intro, Track 1, and the full song, Track 11), “Two Versions of Me”, a great tune that could even please the heads, and “Nothing”, a fairly poppy song with some nice lyrics (some would say they foretold what happened at the end of their 2004 summer tour).  Those would be my main picks.  However, if you’re really not into Phish (perhaps you do like pop music, nothing wrong with that), check out “The Connection” (total pop), or “Crowd Control” (slightly less pop, but has some good political-sounding lyrics).  If you’re a head, check out “A Song I Heard the Ocean Sing”, the only song on the album that has the full Phish musicality to it, or “Undermind”, a song they never played live, but should have.  Everyone should listen to “Grind”.  This song has full on barbershop quartet sound, something very difficult to do well, and they do it really well (they also perform songs like this live, but I don’t think they’ve ever performed this particular one).

Onto Round Room, which I happen to like (I don’t have a favorite Phish album, it’s just not possible).  Newbies should start with “Mexican Cousin”, a light rocker with some odd lyrics, but it’s catchy.  “Round Room” is loved by heads (they love most Mike songs), but it’s a nice fun little pop tune sure to be enjoyed by non-phans.  The heads get this albums easily because the songs are mostly really long.  They should start with “Waves”, a flowing song that basically sounds like the title.  “46 Days” is a great pumping song, that might even be liked by non-phans for it’s rocking tune.  “Wall of the Cave” actually has movements to it.  It starts out with a piano intro and goes into something completely different and changes yet again before the end.  Finally, there’s “Seven Below”, which became kind of a live staple in the post-hiatus years.

The only other issue I had with that article is kind of a geeky one.  They reversed Lawn Boy and Picture of NectarLawn Boy was actually their second album, released in 1990, and Picture of Nectar their third, released in 1992.

Anyway, as you can see from this article, Phish is for everyone.  There’s at least some part of them you’d enjoy regardless of the style of music you prefer.  They’ve played every genre known to man.  They’ve played with people as varied as Kid Rock, Jay Z, Carlos Santana, gospel choirs, Neil Young, and Elvis impersonators.  They’ve plays covers as varied as “Gettin’ Jiggy Wit It” (Will Smith), “Sabotage” (Beastie Boys), “Tubthumping” (Chumbawumba), “Highway to Hell” (AC/DC), and “Sexual Healing” (Marvin Gaye)… and they played them all really well.  Give it a try, you might like it.  I know jambands aren’t popular anymore (which might mean Phish tickets will be easier to come by), but Phish transcends jambands.

Phish for non-phans, a reunion playlist [Paste Magazine]

Southampton 10th Anniversary Old Ale

Last night, I decided to pop open my bottle of Southampton’s 10th Anniversary Old Ale.  This was brewed in 2006 to, obviously, celebrate their 10th anniversary.  The beer was aged some when I bought it, and then it has aged in my cellar the rest of the time.  It’s 2 years old now.

The beer pours a nice brown with hints of red.  It’s a little more carbonated than most old ales, but not overly so.  There was very little head in the pour.  It smells of dark fruits, some sweet malts, some caramel, and a hint of toffee.  The flavor was much the same.  There was a slight hint of alcohol, a nice fruity sweetness mixed with caramel.  The flavor was nice and smooth.  Unfortunately, the carbonation took a little from the overall enjoyment, but the beer itself was still really tasty.  The body was slightly lacking, though it was a nice medium bodied beer.  If I could still find it, I’d probably buy more.  This was a tasty beer.

Unfortunately, I never got to try this one fresh, but it was still worth trying.  I can’t tell how much longer it has, but it could probably last another year or so to let some of that carbonation fizz out and the rest of the alcohol mellow.  However, it’s drinking pretty nice right now.